Figure
shows two shot gathers, Figure
displays two CMP
gathers at about the same location. The reflections at 1.3 s and 1.8 s
are reflections from the top and bottom of a salt layer. The extent of
the salt structure is shown on the near-offset (Figure
)
and stacked section (Figure
). The velocity function
used for the stack is displayed in Figure
.
The top and bottom of the salt are reasonably well-defined in the left and
right part of the section, but do not show up clearly in the middle part.
The salt has flowed upward
in this middle part, bending and faulting the sediments above it.
These warped sediments cause lateral velocity variations, which become
even more pronounced below the salt layer because of variable salt thickness.
The moveout of the reflection events is therefore non-hyperbolic as
can be seen in Figure
, and stacking-velocity analysis breaks down.
Figures
and
show the result of such a
velocity analysis at two midpoints.
The salt top reflection is mostly hyperbolic
in the left part of the section (the semblance peak at 1.2 s in
Figure
is well-defined), whereas the reflection
becomes non-hyperbolic at the dome:
different parts of the moveout curve
stack in at different velocities, broadening the semblance peaks in the
velocity panels. The non-hyperbolicity is caused by lateral
velocity variations in
the bended sediments above the dome, and probably also by discontinuities
in the salt top.
The salt bottom reflection is much less apparent in the velocity
analysis; not only do lateral velocity variations distort the moveout
of this reflection, but it is also much weaker: the high
reflection coefficient at the salt boundary prevents seismic energy
from penetrating the salt structure.