Next: THE DATASET AND ITS
Up: Etgen: Velocity estimation using
Previous: Etgen: Velocity estimation using
In previous reports (Etgen, 1989, 1988),
I detailed a method for estimating interval
velocities using prestack depth migration and residual
prestack migration.
Amoco and Seismograph Service Limited (SSL)
have provided me with a dataset to test
this velocity estimation method.
The dataset is from the North Sea and has a salt dome
and other structure that causes lateral velocity variation.
I wanted
a dataset that had significant lateral velocity variation, but
one where the lateral variation
wasn't so severe that it was difficult to get any image at all or
that I had to know anything
about local geology or needed well logs to solve the problem.
Furthermore, I wanted a dataset that wasn't dominated by deconvolution
or noise problems.
The dataset I received appears to meet these requirements.
This paper describes the data and my initial attempt at deriving
an interval velocity model that gives a good prestack
depth migration of the data. After migration with a velocity model
v(z), the data had residual moveout indicating errors in the
velocity model. Tomographic back-projection of those errors
using the method I presented in previous reports gives an update
to the velocity model in the form of a change in interval slowness.
Next: THE DATASET AND ITS
Up: Etgen: Velocity estimation using
Previous: Etgen: Velocity estimation using
Stanford Exploration Project
1/13/1998