Next: SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION: APPLICATION
Up: Michelena: SVD
Previous: SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION: SHORT
Regardless of how the model is described, the problem of ray theoretic
traveltime tomography always reduces to the solution of a system of
equations of the form:
| |
(2) |
where is a matrix whose nature depends on how the
model is described, is a vector that
contains the variations in model parameters with
respect to a reference model, and
is the misfit between real and calculated
traveltimes.
The model can be described in many different ways. However, in
this paper I will only focus on three of them .
The first one will be the conventional
discretization of the medium in cells of constant slowness Sj (McMechan,
1983):
| |
(3) |
where N is the total number of cells.
The second discretization I will consider will be the one based
on natural pixels (Michelena and Harris, 1991):
| |
(4) |
where the coefficients ai are used to calculate the slowness
perturbation as a superposition of natural pixels
In the previous expressions, M is the total number of traveltimes, which
are calculated also along natural pixels.
Finally, I will consider the discretization of the model in homogeneous
orthogonal regions with elliptical velocity dependencies
(Michelena and Muir, 1991):
| |
(5) |
The reasons why I will perform the SVD only for these three particular
parametrizations are the following:
- Compare the matrices obtained by discretizing the model
in orthogonal
homogeneous cells with those obtained by discretizing the model in
natural pixels (for the isotropic case).
- Compare the matrices obtained by allowing the model to be either
isotropic or anisotropic (when the model is discretized in
orthogonal homogeneous cells).
Next: SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION: APPLICATION
Up: Michelena: SVD
Previous: SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION: SHORT
Stanford Exploration Project
12/18/1997