Next: MODELING NEAR SURFACE LATERAL
Up: Bevc: Near surface v(x,z)
Previous: Bevc: Near surface v(x,z)
The near surface presents many problems for seismologists, but it should
also present many opportunities. While there are often severe velocity
and absorption anomalies in the near surface, the recorded wavefield samples
this region densely.
Kjartansson Claerbout (1985); Kjartansson (1979) developed
a method of locating lateral velocity variations. His method is based on
taking the trace power in some time window and performing slant stacks
of the power maps
in order to determine the anomaly depth. The idea is that energy aligned
along the midpoint axis is due to anomalies at depth and energy aligned
closer to the shot and geophone axes is due to shallow anomalies.
Claerbout 1993 repeats Kjartansson
work and proposes a
method of performing reflection tomography without picking.
I outline a method which incorporates
Kjartansson's 1979 method
and wavefield extrapolation to estimate near surface velocity
distribution. The methodology is not yet complete, but the
building blocks are being put in place. It is these building blocks
that I present in this report.
I begin by modeling shallow velocity anomalies which are shorter in lateral
extent than the spread length. Synthetic data are generated
by upward continuing a synthetic wavefield through a v(x,z) model.
The location of the velocity anomaly is determined by analyzing a plot
of trace power in midpoint-offset coordinates. The trace power plots
are then input to an iterative slant-stack algorithm
to generate images of the velocity anomalies.
I downward continue the data through the v(x,z) model to demonstrate
that distortions due to the anomaly can be removed.
This method can be used as an iterative inversion process to determine
near surface velocity.
Next: MODELING NEAR SURFACE LATERAL
Up: Bevc: Near surface v(x,z)
Previous: Bevc: Near surface v(x,z)
Stanford Exploration Project
11/16/1997