(Message inbox:4452)
Received: from sep.stanford.edu (arran.Stanford.EDU [171.64.169.168]) by kana.stanford.edu (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA20009; Mon, 18 Sep 2000 16:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: bob
Message-ID: <39C6A853.79EA459C@sep.stanford.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 16:42:11 -0700
From: Robert Clapp <bob>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jon Claerbout <jon>
CC: sergey
Subject: Re: figs busted in GEE
References: <200009071937.MAA76999@kana.stanford.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This shouldn't be a problem now (as long as people compile SEPlib
correctly)

1. the sources + limited documentation are contained in ~prof/gee/Ops
2. make book will remove the documentation and put the undocumented code
in ~prof/gee/Ops/book
3. When compiled correctly, the first step will be to copy all of the
GEE sources into SEPlib
4. The library compiled by SEPlib has a different name (sepgeef90 rather
than geef90)

As far as consistent code.

Sean's is significantly different.
Prety much the same as Sergey's, but not totally.  I haven't added
anything to
the basic strucutre, but I do have several replacement codes (nbound
sticks
out in my mind).  The replacements were because 

-a) I used a significantly faster mechanism to accomplish the same thing
-b) I thought there was a bug/or potential bug in gee's library.

Bob

Jon Claerbout wrote:
> 
>         Hi Bob,
> 
>         I hope you and Sergey have worked it out that
>         there will not be two libraries.
>         If there must be two libraries, then I need
>         to do a better job of explaining the difference.
> 
>         Another related thorny matter is whether you and Sean and Sergey,
>         or at least, you and Sergey, have consistent code
>         for tv filters, radial smoothing, etc.