Next: Hyperbolic Moveout
Up: Symes: Differential semblance
Previous: Asymptotic Approximation of Differential
Assume that the data S are model-consistent, that is

for target offset independent reflectivity r*(t0) and velocity
v*(t0). [Since differential semblance does not depend to leading
order on the amplitude, as noted above, I set the amplitude to 1 in
the following, for simplicity - it can be reintroduced with almost no
change in the results to follow.]
Note that

so

(s being the stretch factor, defined above). Thus

(s* is the stretch factor belonging to v*) whence
![\begin{displaymath}
F[v]WG[v]S(t,x)=\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+p(t,x)
\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\right)r^*(T_0^*(t,x))\end{displaymath}](img33.gif)

According to the calculus of pseudodifferential operators,
![\begin{displaymath}
H \phi F[v]WG[v]S =\end{displaymath}](img35.gif)



where you get from the next to the last line to the last by
substituting
for
, and using previously
derived formulas for the partial derivatives of T0.
Thus
![\begin{displaymath}
J_0[v]=\int\int \,dt\,dx\, B^*(t,x)(p(t,x)-p^*(t,x))^2 [r^*(T_0^*(t,x))]^2
+O(\lambda)\end{displaymath}](img41.gif)
where

is independent of v, i.e. depending only on v* and
.
In the next section I introduce the so called hyperbolic moveout approximation
to traveltime. Note that up to this point the development is entirely
independent of this approximation. In particular the formulas worked
out in this section have precise analogues for versions of differential
semblance based on multidimensional seismic models.
Next: Hyperbolic Moveout
Up: Symes: Differential semblance
Previous: Asymptotic Approximation of Differential
Stanford Exploration Project
4/20/1999