Next: Discussion
Up: Results
Previous: Subtraction method
Figure
compares the convergence of the filtering, subtraction
and ``simplest'' methods. The subtraction scheme converges significantly better
than the two other schemes.
Figure
displays the three velocity panels corresponding to each approach
(30 iterations). The two proposed methods increase the resolution of the velocity space compared
to the ``simplest'' scheme.
The table below intends to summarize some practical issues for each strategy when coherent
noise is present in the input data:
|
|
PEF |
Regularization |
|
Stability |
Methods |
Convergence |
estimation |
needed ? |
Residual |
(iterations) |
Filtering |
Slow |
Easy |
Not all the time |
IID |
Stable |
Subtraction |
Fast |
Difficult |
Yes |
IID |
Stable |
Simplest |
Slow |
NA |
Not all the time |
not IID |
Unstable |
The ``PEF estimation'' columns relates to the difficulty of estimating the residual PEF in
Equation 11 and the coherent noise PEF in Equation 15.
Next: Discussion
Up: Results
Previous: Subtraction method
Stanford Exploration Project
9/5/2000