next up previous print clean
Next: Analysis for leveled inverse Up: LEVELED INVERSE INTERPOLATION Previous: LEVELED INVERSE INTERPOLATION

Test results for leveled inverse interpolation

Figures 27 and 28 show the same example as in Figures [*] and [*]. What is new here is that the proper PEF is not given but is determined from the data. Figure 27 was made with a three-coefficient filter (1,a1,a2) and Figure 28 was made with a five-coefficient filter (1,a1,a2,a3,a4). The main difference in the figures is where the data is sparse. The data points in Figures [*], 27 and 28 are samples from a sinusoid.

 
subsine390
Figure 27
Interpolating with a three-term filter. The interpolated signal is fairly monofrequency.

subsine390
[*] view burn build edit restore

 
subsine590
Figure 28
Interpolating with a five term filter.

subsine590
[*] view burn build edit restore

Comparing Figures [*] and [*] to Figures 27 and 28 we conclude that by finding and imposing the prediction-error filter while finding the model space, we have interpolated beyond aliasing in data space.


next up previous print clean
Next: Analysis for leveled inverse Up: LEVELED INVERSE INTERPOLATION Previous: LEVELED INVERSE INTERPOLATION
Stanford Exploration Project
12/15/2000