Recall the Gulf of Mexico dataset presented in chapter .
We did a reasonably careful job of NMO velocity analysis
in order to produce the stack shown in Figure
.
But is this the best possible stack?
To begin to answer this question, Figure 14 shows
some constant-velocity stacks of this dataset done with subroutine
velsimp()
.
This figure clearly shows that
there are some very steeply-dipping reflections
that are missing in Figure
.
These steep reflections appear only when the NMO velocity
is quite high compared with the velocity
that does a good job on the horizontal reflectors.
This phenomenon is consistent with
the predictions of equation (12),
which says that dipping events
require a higher NMO velocity than nearby horizontal events.
![]() |
Another way of seeing the same conflict in the data
is to look at a velocity-analysis panel
at a single common-midpoint location
such as the panel shown in Figure 15
made by subroutine velsimp() .
In this figure it is easy to see that the velocity
which is good for the dipping event at 1.5 sec is too high
for the horizontal events in its vicinity.
velscan
Figure 15 Velocity analysis panel of one of the panels in Figure 14 before (left) and after (right) DMO. Notice two velocities at the same time before DMO. | ![]() |