next up previous print clean
Next: My rise-time proof of Up: TIME-FREQUENCY RESOLUTION Previous: The uncertainty principle in

Gabor's proof of the uncertainty principle

Although it is easy to verify the uncertainty principle in many special cases, it is not easy to deduce it. The difficulty begins from finding a definition of the width of a function that leads to a tractable analysis. One possible definition uses a second moment; that is, $\Lambda T$ is defined by  
 \begin{displaymath}
(\Lambda T)^2 \eq { \int \ t^2 \, b(t)^2\, dt
 \over \int b(t)^2\, dt }\end{displaymath} (2)
The spectral bandwidth $\Lambda F$ is defined likewise. With these definitions, Dennis Gabor prepared a widely reproduced proof. I will omit his proof here; it is not an easy proof; it is widely available; and the definition (2) seems inappropriate for a function we often use, the sinc function, i.e., the FT of a step function. Since the sinc function drops off as t-1, its width $\Lambda T$ defined with (2) is infinity, which is unlike the more human measure of width, the distance to the first axis crossing.


next up previous print clean
Next: My rise-time proof of Up: TIME-FREQUENCY RESOLUTION Previous: The uncertainty principle in
Stanford Exploration Project
10/21/1998