ABSTRACT
New estimates of anisotropy have revealed more details
of the subsurface in Trinidad. These estimates are obtained by including
more realistic constraints on the anisotropic inversion, which eventually helped
boost the stability of the process.
The anisotropic parameter
, which, if not zero, implies the existence of anisotropy,
is used to discriminate conservatively between shales and sands. The
underlying theory is that shales induce anisotropy, positive in particular,
and sands do not. The estimates, through have nice lateral correlation, react
to the presence of faults.
Correlation of these results with
gamma-ray well-log measurements used as a shale
estimate proves the credibility of the results. This finding confirms the
hypothesis that anisotropy is caused by shales in the subsurface, and, consequently, we can use
the inversion for interval to estimate
lithology.
|