I can unify
the datuming formulations of the previous sections
by observing that they can all be cast in the same
general framework.
Suppose that a wavefield is recorded on an irregular datum.
The forward
problem is to upward continue the wavefield to some flat surface,
as schematically represented in Figure
.
The algorithm begins
by upward continuing the data from the lowest point
on the topographic datum. Each time the wavefield reaches
a point where the computational grid coincides with
the datum, data are inserted into the upward-propagated wavefield.
The adjoint process starts by downward continuing the data from a
flat surface, and each time the computation reaches the irregular
datum, the values of the wavefield are extracted at the appropriate
location.
The wavefield can be propagated upward using any
wave-equation depth extrapolation technique (Kirchhoff, phase-shift,
or finite-difference) discussed in the previous sections.
The generalized form of the upward continuation datuming operator
corresponding to the geometry of Figure
can be written as
![]() |
(25) |
).
).
For v(x,z), Wi corresponds
to the PSPI operator Ui defined in equation (
).
)
between level datums. Since this generalized formulation of
datuming uses smaller depth steps than are commonly used with
Kirchhoff methods, it is critical that the near-field term of
equation (
) or equation (
) is retained.
The downward continuation datuming operator is given by the adjoint
of equation (
):
![]() |
(26) |